Last update on 2020-09-20 / Affiliate links / Updated prices and images from Amazon Product Advertising API
Look at the specifications of these mics in the table below.
Last update on 2020-09-29 / Affiliate links / Updated prices and images from Amazon Product Advertising API
In this review, I’ll be helping you decide upon either one of these mics and let you know the subtle differences that these mics have got to offer.
Let’s get started – the Rode NT1 vs NT1A.
Rode NT1 vs NT1A: Let’s clear the smoke
Both of these Rode mics come with a solid-full body metal construction. As with all the Rode mics, these are built extremely well considering even little intricates in mind.
Both of these mics come with 10-years of Rode warranty, that speaks a lot about the durability of these mics.
That’s NT1A being 18% lighter.
Both of these mics require a good 48v phantom power from your audio interface or a mixer. I would recommend Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 or the Steinberg UR22 interfaces for clean recordings.
When it comes to box, the Rode NT1A comes with SM6 shock mount with a detachable pop filter, 6m XLR cable, and also the dust cover.
The NT1 also comes with almost the same accessories except it does come with SMR instead of the shock mount. And also, the NT1’s pop filter is built into the shock mount. The NT1 does not come with an XLR cable.
So, for NT1 you may want to get a good XLR cable like these ones.
Both of these mics have a quite significant sound quality difference, in the audiophiliac standpoint.
Although both of these mics have the same standard frequency range of 20Hz – 20kHz, there’s some difference when it comes to charts.
Above is the frequency graph of Rode NT1.
As you can see, the NT1 has a flatter profile. It leads to a true representation of vocals without any considerable boosts or cuts.
The sound profile of Rode NT1 resembles a lot to that of Neumann U87 without that price difference. The frequencies between the 30Hz and 4kHz offer extreme fidelity.
The signal is amazingly clear, but in order to get the most of it, you certainly need to be good at manipulating the vocals post-production.
As you can see the NT1A has quite bumps and cuts here and there. You can see that there are cuts in the lows and also extreme highs. We also see a slight boost at the 150Hz and the 6kHz-12kHz range.
The highs tend to sound bright, and whereas the low ends appears to be slight rolled-off.
The differences between the two can be found evidently when comparing these two with acoustic guitars.
Refer to the above track if you want to see how the NT1A performs when it comes to vocals.
- Both of these mics have a cardioid pattern
- Both of these mics come with 10-years of warranty from Rode
- Both these mics have a gold sputtered, 1-inch diaphragm
- They have the same frequency range of 20Hz – 20kHz
- NT1A weighs a lot less when compared to NT1 i.e 325 grams vs 395 grams
- NT1 is a bit costlier than NT1A
- The NT1A mic is a bit brighter than the NT1 in treble regions – making it best worse for male vocals
- NT1A lacks in lows, making an NT1A warmer-sounding microphone
- NT1A has a lower self-noise, the difference is 0.5dB that’s negligible
- NT1A can record louder sources more effectively due to the SPL of 137dB when compared to that of 132dB offered by NT1.
- Frequency spectrum is flatter
- Need to pay extra for buying XLR cable
- Low noise floor, hence good clarity in recordings
- Louder sources are recorded effectively
- Lightweight when compared to NT1
- It doesn’t come with features like padding switch, multi pattern or bass roll off.
See our other popular comparisons:
1. NT1000 vs NT1A: Which is the Best Mic for Recording Vocals and Acoustic Guitars?
2. Rode NT1 vs AT2035: Which is Your go to Mic for Recording Vocals?
FAQs on Rode NT1 vs NT1A
Yes. Both of these mics require 48v phantom power from an audio interface or a mixer.
NT1 has a flatter profile and works well in treble regions, making it best for male vocals.
Both of these mics have very low self-noise. The difference is 0.5dB which is negligible
NT1 has a flatter profile along with its entire frequency range while NT1A has quite bumps and cuts here and there.
Rode NT1A due to its maximum SPL of 137dB records louder sources effectively.
Now it’s the time to declare the winner in this Rode NT1 and Rode NT1A battle!
It all comes down to your personal preferences and use cases.
Want a warmer sounding mic that does well on male vocals? Go for Rode NT1.
Do you want a brighter mic with good bumps in the treble range? then go for NT1A.
You need to also remember that Rode NT1 offers a flatter frequency profile when compared to the NT1A, making it more suitable for recording reference tracks.
For me, Rode NT1 easily comes out as a winner, in spite of the price difference. The reason is because of the flatter frequency profile and warmer sound – perfectly suitable for both male and female vocals.
Hope you loved this comparison.
Let me know what you think below in the comments section. What’s your favorite mic? The Rode NT1 or Rode NT1A?
Hi, I’m Jennifer I’m a passionate singer and an audiophile from Detroit, MI.
I’m on a mission to help music creators to create fine music that help them position uniquely in the saturated music space.
Follow my blog for regular content :-)